Skip to main content

One post tagged with "agi"

View All Tags

RSI: What Recursive Self-Improvement Actually Is, and Why Everyone Disagrees About It

· 15 min read
Austin Xu
Cloud Platform Engineering Leader

A recursive spiral of glowing crystalline structures, symbolizing an AI system building smaller copies of itself

On September 6, 2026, three days after GPT-6 Astra shipped, OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki published a rare essay titled "An Alien Mind." The tone was unusually grave for the genre: no lab, including his own, has solved alignment and monitoring well enough to justify scaling at maximum speed. Models keep getting more capable and harder to fully understand or supervise. What should worry you isn't what they can't do yet — it's that they've started participating in something specific: improving AI itself. That's the subject of this post.

The alarm isn't coming from nowhere. In May, Dario Amodei said something that carried real weight: Claude is helping design Claude. Not "Claude writes code" — Claude's own suggestions are shaping the architecture of the next Claude.

That same month, Yuandong Tian brought his company out of stealth. He's Meta FAIR's former research director, known for ELF OpenGo, an open-source system that replicated AlphaZero's core ideas, and he'd already left Meta the year before. This time he surfaced with seven co-founders, including Richard Socher — who led AI research at Salesforce and now serves as CEO. The company is called Recursive, also known as Recursive Superintelligence: $650M raised, $4.65B valuation, personal backers including Jensen Huang and Lisa Su.

Three months later, in August, Jeff Dean left too. Google employee number 30, 27 years in, he took Sanjay Ghemawat, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc Le with him to co-found Discovery Loop, with an explicit mandate to run thousands of experiments in parallel and pursue recursive self-improvement directly.

Tian's company had already delivered its first result: the same automated research system beat human GPU experts on a kernel-optimization benchmark. Google's own AI co-scientist got a paper through Nature peer review. And a Princeton study found the same class of models fail at exactly this kind of task.

This is RSI, recursive self-improvement. I've spent the last month going deep on it for my own knowledge base, and it's the first AI topic in a while where I came out the other side less certain than when I went in. That uncertainty is the actual finding. This post is the map: what RSI is, who's building it, what evidence exists on both sides, and why the smartest people in the field can't agree on whether it's happening.